Abstract The Journal Impact Factor has a number of drawbacks preventing its use for assessment of separate journal articles and individuals. With that in mind, most experts would endorse the San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA), which highlights the appropriate use of bibliometric indicators for quantitative research assessments. To curb the problem of skewed citations, an alternative, normalised metric is proposed. Percentiles, or percentile rank classes method is particularly useful for the normalisation. It is also advised to use specifi
effects of (a) fractional counting on the impact factor (IF) and (b) transformation of the skewed ci...
The prediction of the long-term impact of a scientific article is challenging task, addressed by the...
Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. Th...
The impact factor of journals has been widely used as glory quotients. Despite its limitations, this...
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
We submit newly developed citation impact indicators based not on arithmetic averages of citations b...
Allocation of research funding, as well as promotion and tenure decisions, are increasingly made usi...
We submit newly developed citation impact indicators based not on arithmetic averages of citations b...
We submit newly developed citation impact indicators based not on arithmetic averages of citations b...
271-277This paper presents a new journal indicator of citation impact of a scientific-scholarly jou...
tiles (or percentile rank classes) are the most suitable method for normalizing the citation counts ...
Journal editors are constantly seeking to improve the excellence of their journals. One of the main ...
Interest is rising for alterative impact measures derived from Garfield's Journal Impact Factor (JIF...
<p>Evaluative bibliometrics compares the citation impact of researchers, research groups and institu...
effects of (a) fractional counting on the impact factor (IF) and (b) transformation of the skewed ci...
The prediction of the long-term impact of a scientific article is challenging task, addressed by the...
Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. Th...
The impact factor of journals has been widely used as glory quotients. Despite its limitations, this...
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
For comparisons of citation impacts across fields and over time, bibliometricians normalize the obse...
We submit newly developed citation impact indicators based not on arithmetic averages of citations b...
Allocation of research funding, as well as promotion and tenure decisions, are increasingly made usi...
We submit newly developed citation impact indicators based not on arithmetic averages of citations b...
We submit newly developed citation impact indicators based not on arithmetic averages of citations b...
271-277This paper presents a new journal indicator of citation impact of a scientific-scholarly jou...
tiles (or percentile rank classes) are the most suitable method for normalizing the citation counts ...
Journal editors are constantly seeking to improve the excellence of their journals. One of the main ...
Interest is rising for alterative impact measures derived from Garfield's Journal Impact Factor (JIF...
<p>Evaluative bibliometrics compares the citation impact of researchers, research groups and institu...
effects of (a) fractional counting on the impact factor (IF) and (b) transformation of the skewed ci...
The prediction of the long-term impact of a scientific article is challenging task, addressed by the...
Various kinds of metrics used for the quantitative evaluation of scholarly journals are reviewed. Th...